When
describing Shiblon, they didn’t just say he was righteous, but listed three
specific things:
1.
He was a just man
2.
He walked uprightly before God
3.
He did observe to do good continually, to keep
the commandments of God
Why
are those three things specific? When I look up just is says behavior based on
that which is morally right and fair. I think that has to do with how you treat
others. It feels like it is related to having integrity.
Uprightly
is defined as honest, honorable, and straightforward. So before God I guess has
to do with not being a hypocrite, and having a pure heart. Not trying to fake
it. So then when they tell us he tried to good, we know it was because of pure
intentions. It was a real goodness, a real follower of Christ.
I
feel like being authentic is something I struggle with. I am almost always
worried about what people think of me. I need to be more like Shiblon, more
upright. This description feels like such a clear description of what I want to
aspire to, and the struggles I want to overcome.
I
wonder why it was so important to record about all the people heading North and
off in ships. What do we learn from that?
It
is interesting that Helaman and Shiblon were brothers. They were both good men,
who did important things, but one is remembered and revered, and the other
briefly mentioned. Sometimes it is hard for me to feel like the quiet life of righteousness
is worth as much as the one who changes the world or performs some notable
heroics. It is sometimes hard for me to be at peace with the role I found in
life. Just a mom. Just a wife. Just. It all sometimes feels like not enough. But
reading about Shiblon I feel peaceful about walking uprightly before God, and
letting that be enough.
No comments:
Post a Comment