Monday, February 1, 2016

Alma 54

Why did Moroni start his epistle with calling Amaron out for his wickedness and telling him he was going to hell unless he repented. And then it wasn’t even a loving call to repentance, because he followed that with saying he knew he would reject it. It is interesting to me, though, that Moroni wasn’t wishing for Amaron and his brother to go to hell. He still saw repentance as an option for them if they were willing to take it. The imperfect human reaction, like being cut off is hoping someone crashes. But Moroni wasn’t hoping they would go to hell, just recognizing the reality if they didn’t change their path. Although he does call him a child of hell.
I always assumed Amaron was talking about the government being robbed from the Lamenites, because I thought he was responding to Moroni’s allusion in his letter. However, it makes more sense that he is talking about the king-men, here. Amalikiah though he should have been the Nephite king, is that who Amaron thinks was robbed?
It is interesting that Amaron rejects the idea of obedience as a requirement for God’s protection and blessings. He isn’t sure there is a God, but if there is, says he made us as well as you, which Moroni would have agreed with, if they were having a real conversation. The thing that Amaron, and people today don’t want to acknowledge, is that God requires anything of us. God is a God of love, but that love desires our growth and progression. Just like the love of earthly parents truly requires them to set boundaries and make rules for the protection and progression of their children.
It always strikes me how much pain Amaron is feeling at the loss of his brother. It comes through so clearly in his return letter, especially in his response to Mornoi’s hinting that he has gone to hell.

Oh, wait, I was wrong, Amaron claims that the war is for the Lamenites to reclaim their rights of government. It is a strange claim, since the Nephites never tried to rule over the Lamenites, they just left. It is a strange idea to think that you get to force people to be your subjects, though I suppose that is the way most of the world has worked throughout history, and even a lot of it today. It makes me grateful to live in a free country, with grand ideas of democracy and self-determination. It also makes me think about my right to “rule” in my family. I often want to rule by force, but that doesn’t feel like the best way. Just the easiest.

No comments:

Post a Comment